Defining Your Next Network Architecture: Cost Effectiveness

In my previous blog entry, Defining Your Next Network Architecture: Topologies and Global Standards, I addressed two topics to consider when moving from the “bus” to the “net”.  Here is the next topic I feel you should consider.

Cost Effectiveness – how can we lower the cost and not lose functionality?

  • Find a solution that requires fewer IP Addresses.  In an ethernet based network, every IP Address has an associated cost tied to it.  With fewer IP Addresses, you need less ethernet switch ports, fewer shielded network cables, and lower other physical cost involved with an ethernet solution.  With fewer IP Addresses to monitor, you can observe any changes or network communications problems faster, which leads to more uptime ($).
  • Find a solution that allows for easy device replacement.  With Profibus and DeviceNet, swapping out a device was as easy as setting a few dip switches and connecting the new device to the network.  Look for products that can be replaced similarly, by either the device’s addressing method or by the PLC’s replacement function.  I would consider looking at alternate ways to have field devices replaced that require no addressing.  Anyway you go faster replacement equates to less downtime ($).
  • Find a solution that is easy to integrate.  Look for vendors who offer Function Blocks and Add-On Instructions that eliminate much of the confusion on how to integrate a product into the PLC logic.  With provided Function Blocks and Add-On Instructions, you can focus on programming the machine’s function, rather than battling configuring and programming the field devices.  With easier integration, machines can be built faster, or devices can be added to existing machines quicker, which all adds up to more throughput ($).
  • Find a solution with more IP67 options.  There is no arguing that an IP67 device is more expensive than an IP20 when put head to head, but an overall IP67 solution is less expensive with everything considered in the installation.  First, more IP67 products reduce control cabinet space and remove the need for small junction boxes.  By using smaller cabinets or no cabinets is a huge saving, as well as, a smaller cabinet needs a smaller air conditioning unit.  Another way to save is to consider IP67 power supplies, which can help greatly, reduce cabinet sizes and need for air conditioning units.  IP67 devices also allow for less cabling and wiring time.  By using more IP67 devices you can reduce cabinet size, lower cable costs , and reduce labor time, while being Green environmentally, as well as, fiscally ($).

 

My upcoming blogs will look at Diagnostics, Scalability & Flexibility and Trends in the market, which you should consider in your next network architecture.

This entry was posted in All posts. Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to Defining Your Next Network Architecture: Cost Effectiveness

  1. Carl Henning says:

    John, PROFINET offers “Simple Device Replacement” that requires no setting of physical switches like PROFIBUS does. It does not require any configuration via computer either. The PLC knows what devices are connected and can restore the system to running condition and the only thing the mainenance technician has to do is physically replace the device with the same make and model. PROFINET uses the standard LLDP protocol to work this magic.

    –Carl Henning
    http://www.AllThingsPROFINET.com

  2. My brother recommended I may like this website.
    He was once totally right. This publish actually made my day.
    You can not imagine just how a lot time I had spent for this information!
    Thanks!

  3. mba degree says:

    You really make it seem so easy with your presentation
    but I find this topic to be actually something which I think I would never understand.
    It seems too complicated and extremely broad for me. I’m looking forward for your next post, I will try to get the hang of it!

What do you think?

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s